Recently, two cases handled by our firm have received significant judicial recognition: Invention Patent Infringement Case Concerning the “Clutch Assembly” was included in the Judgment Digests of the Intellectual Property Court of the Supreme People’s Court of China (2025); and the trademark infringement and unfair competition case on “宝树堂” was selected as one of the Top Ten Typical Cases of Judicial Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in Yantai Courts (2025).
These honors not only reflect the high recognition by judicial authorities of the adjudicative value of these cases, but also demonstrate the affirmation of our firm’s capabilities and quality by the industry and our clients.
I. Selected as Judgment Digests of the Intellectual Property Court of the Supreme People’s Court of China (2025) – Clarifying Patent Infringement Adjudication Rules
In the patent infringement dispute concerning the “Clutch Assembly,” our firm represented the rights holder throughout the proceedings. Focusing on core issues such as technical comparison, infringement determination, and liability, we established a complete evidence chain and fully presented our arguments based on laws and regulations and technical facts.
This case was heard by the Intellectual Property Court of the Supreme People’s Court and included in its annual judgement digest. The judgment rules derived from this case become an important reference and guidance for similar cases-patent infringement and contributory infringement over component. It clarifies the IP compliance boundaries in the production and sale of components, and offers clear judicial guidance for tech innovation enterprises in patent protection and enforcement.
II. Selected into Typical Case of Yantai Court – Strictly Curbing Bad-Faith Brand Infringement
In “宝树堂” trademark infringement and unfair competition case, the infringing parties engaged in long-term bad faith imitation and repeat infringements with egregious circumstances.
Our attorneys presented precise evidence and rigorous arguments on key issues including the protection of the exclusive right to use, imitation of product trade dress, determination of unfair competition, and application of punitive damages. Based on the laws and regulations, we safeguarded the brand owner’s legitimate trademark rights and market competition order, effectively curbing bad-faith and repeat infringement.
This case was recognized by the local court as a typical annual case for judicial IP protection. It clearly demonstrates the judiciary's strengthened commitment to IP protection and its uncompromising stance against bad-faith infringement. Moreover, it offers brand owners a practical reference for cross-regional enforcement and mitigating counterfeiting risks.
Our firm continues to advance in IP dispute resolution and compliance legal services, specializing in complex and difficult cases involving patents, trademarks, trade secrets, unfair competition, and more. With extensive experience in handling major and challenging cases, many of our cases have been selected as typical cases by courts at various levels and included in judicial reference documents.
Going forward, our firm will remain committed to our professional foundation, continuously enhance our legal service capabilities, and deepen our engagement in the field of IP protection. We strive to provide professional, reliable, and meticulous legal services for IP enforcement, portfolio management, and compliance to all types of market participants, helping enterprises strengthen their awareness of IP protection, and supporting innovation-driven development and fair competition in the marketplace.
These honors not only reflect the high recognition by judicial authorities of the adjudicative value of these cases, but also demonstrate the affirmation of our firm’s capabilities and quality by the industry and our clients.
I. Selected as Judgment Digests of the Intellectual Property Court of the Supreme People’s Court of China (2025) – Clarifying Patent Infringement Adjudication Rules
In the patent infringement dispute concerning the “Clutch Assembly,” our firm represented the rights holder throughout the proceedings. Focusing on core issues such as technical comparison, infringement determination, and liability, we established a complete evidence chain and fully presented our arguments based on laws and regulations and technical facts.
This case was heard by the Intellectual Property Court of the Supreme People’s Court and included in its annual judgement digest. The judgment rules derived from this case become an important reference and guidance for similar cases-patent infringement and contributory infringement over component. It clarifies the IP compliance boundaries in the production and sale of components, and offers clear judicial guidance for tech innovation enterprises in patent protection and enforcement.
II. Selected into Typical Case of Yantai Court – Strictly Curbing Bad-Faith Brand Infringement
In “宝树堂” trademark infringement and unfair competition case, the infringing parties engaged in long-term bad faith imitation and repeat infringements with egregious circumstances.
Our attorneys presented precise evidence and rigorous arguments on key issues including the protection of the exclusive right to use, imitation of product trade dress, determination of unfair competition, and application of punitive damages. Based on the laws and regulations, we safeguarded the brand owner’s legitimate trademark rights and market competition order, effectively curbing bad-faith and repeat infringement.
This case was recognized by the local court as a typical annual case for judicial IP protection. It clearly demonstrates the judiciary's strengthened commitment to IP protection and its uncompromising stance against bad-faith infringement. Moreover, it offers brand owners a practical reference for cross-regional enforcement and mitigating counterfeiting risks.
Our firm continues to advance in IP dispute resolution and compliance legal services, specializing in complex and difficult cases involving patents, trademarks, trade secrets, unfair competition, and more. With extensive experience in handling major and challenging cases, many of our cases have been selected as typical cases by courts at various levels and included in judicial reference documents.
Going forward, our firm will remain committed to our professional foundation, continuously enhance our legal service capabilities, and deepen our engagement in the field of IP protection. We strive to provide professional, reliable, and meticulous legal services for IP enforcement, portfolio management, and compliance to all types of market participants, helping enterprises strengthen their awareness of IP protection, and supporting innovation-driven development and fair competition in the marketplace.